Pros and Cons Cedar Decking vs Composite
Environmental Impact
When considering the environmental impact of building a deck, it is essential to weigh the pros and cons of using cedar versus composite materials. Cedar is a natural, renewable resource that can be sustainably harvested. According to the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), responsibly sourced cedar can help reduce carbon emissions and promote biodiversity. However, the production process for composite materials often involves the use of plastics and resins, which are derived from non-renewable resources. On the other hand, some composite manufacturers have started using recycled materials in their products, reducing their environmental footprint.
Cost-Effectiveness
Cost is a significant factor when deciding between cedar and composite decking. Cedar is generally less expensive upfront compared to composite materials. However, cedar requires more maintenance over time, such as regular sealing or staining, which can add to the overall cost. Composite decking, while initially more expensive, requires minimal maintenance and has a longer lifespan, potentially making it a more cost-effective option in the long run. A study by the National Association of Home Builders found that composite decks typically last longer than cedar decks, leading to fewer replacement costs over time.
Appearance
One of the main advantages of cedar is its natural beauty. Cedar has a warm, rich color that complements many outdoor settings. It also develops a beautiful silver-gray patina over time, adding character and charm to any deck. In contrast, composite decking is available in a variety of colors and patterns, allowing homeowners to customize their deck’s look. However, the appearance of composite materials may fade over time, especially if exposed to direct sunlight, and they may not achieve the same aesthetic appeal as cedar.
Long-Term Durability
Both cedar and composite materials offer excellent durability, but they excel in different ways. Cedar is naturally resistant to rot, decay, and insect damage, making it an ideal choice for outdoor applications. However, cedar can warp, twist, or crack if not properly maintained. Composite materials, on the other hand, are highly resistant to moisture, stains, and UV rays, reducing the risk of warping or cracking. Additionally, composite materials do not require sealing or staining, further enhancing their longevity.
Expert Opinions and Real-World Examples
According to a report by the American Society of Landscape Architects, cedar is a popular choice for those seeking a natural, rustic look, while composite materials are favored for their low-maintenance and durability. Homeowner Sarah Johnson from Portland, Oregon, opted for cedar decking due to its aesthetic appeal and environmental benefits. “I love how my cedar deck blends seamlessly with the surrounding landscape,” she says. Meanwhile, John Thompson from Denver, Colorado, chose composite decking for its ease of maintenance. “After installing my composite deck five years ago, I haven’t had to do anything except sweep it occasionally,” he explains.
Conclusion
Choosing between cedar and composite decking depends on your priorities and preferences. If you prioritize sustainability and aesthetics, cedar might be the better choice. However, if you prefer a low-maintenance option with a longer lifespan, composite materials could be more suitable. Ultimately, both options offer unique benefits and drawbacks, and it’s important to consider all factors before making a decision.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.